May 01, 2006The Wedding Bill BluesAs I may have mentioned before, I am dangerously close to becoming an old coot, if in fact, that particular white-belt-and-shoes-to-match bridge hasn't been crossed already. The latest sign that I am utterly and inexorably out of touch with modern American culture came last week at a large chain of tuxedo rental places. A good friend is getting married (well, he may not be a "good friend" if he and his bride see this), and I've been asked to be part of the wedding party, which requires me to rent a monkey suit. (Actually, it would be quite a different --- and in my opinion, better --- wedding if the bridal party wore genuine monkey suits. But no one asked me.) ... Time was when you could rent a tux at Kadar's or David Israel's or Hi-Way Tux Shop ("VAlley 3-8042"), and be fitted by someone who actually looked like they had worn formal clothes at some point in their life. Alas, the staff at this place (chosen by my friend and the bride because the groom's tux is free) was barely old enough to shave, let alone tie a necktie without mom's help. "Customer service" were vague words they had heard only once, briefly, in between personal cell phone calls. And, it's prom time, which means that the rest of the customers in the joint were (like the staff) also 17-something. Everyone in the place was staring at me as if I was their dad, or possibly a narc. (I had just come from work and was wearing a suit and tie.) ... Finally, someone who looked like she remembered the first George Bush took pity and took my measurements. The bride and groom wanted everyone to rent shoes as well, she said. Fine. They turned out to be plain black loafers of that really phony-looking shiny leatherette favored by high-school marching bands. And naturally, they didn't have them in my size. (I take a triple-E shoe, and you know what they say about a guy with big feet. That's right: He pays more for shoes.) Then she showed me the tux. "Is this OK?" "Well, since it's what everyone else is wearing, I don't think I have much choice." She laughed. ... The tux jacket was a plain single-breasted business suit cut --- no tails, and not a cutaway. The men in the wedding party won't be wearing bowties, just plain silk neckties. The shirts don't even have French cuffs. Total damage, $92. So, I'm paying almost $100 to rent a plain black suit for one night (for less than $200, I could buy the same damned suit off the rack at Berks), plus I have to take a pair of uncomfortable shoes that aren't as nice looking as the black leather Florsheims I wore into the store. And they've got to be back before 12 noon the day after the wedding, or they'll ding me for another day's rental. At least I don't have to worry that I'll look like a goober (any more than usual). But if I'm out 92 clams for a tuxedo, I think I should at least be getting the whole shebang --- ruffled shirt, cummerbund, maybe a powder-blue jacket with shiny black lapels or a red crushed-velvet job. Maybe I'll rent one of those for the reception. ... Don't get me wrong --- my friend's a great guy, his bride is wonderful, too, and I'm honored as all get out to stand around and try not to make an idiot of myself at their wedding. But if you're a grumpy grouse (and I'm single, or does that go without saying?) like me, some of the preparations start to seem a bit silly, or at least way overpriced. Take the food at the wedding reception. Back in my kidhood, Mon Valley wedding receptions were held at the fire hall, and featured the classic menu of "riggy, piggy, chicky" with a cookie table. My friend's wedding --- like all of the ones I've been to recently --- is being held at a banquet facility that specializes in weddings, and it's going to cost the bride and groom a couple of double sawbucks for each person who attends. And frankly, my friend and his bride are doing things sensibly and conservatively, compared to some other recent weddings I've seen. ... In a stunning coincidence, I arrived home from the tuxedo shop to read in the Christian Science Monitor that weddings are now a $120 billion per year industry in this country:
And just who do you think is pushing these spiraling costs? Why, florists, caterers and tuxedo rental shops, writer Kamy Wicoff tells the Monitor. "They imply that if you're looking at cutting costs or not doing things 'right' --- which is code for 'expensively' --- your priorities aren't straight," she says. Increasingly elaborate weddings are self-perpetuating: If you see your friends spending five grand on flowers, well, you don't want to look like some cheap yobbo when you get married, so you spend six grand. Your friends see this, and when they get married, they spend seven grand to outdo your wedding. And so on. ... I mean, seriously: Twenty-three grand? I know I'm an old poop, but the wedding and the reception take a total of what, four hours? Maybe five? The couple is going to spend (Lord willing) the rest of their lives together. So wouldn't that $23,000 be better spent on a smaller, less ostentatious reception ... and a kick-ass honeymoon that lasts a week or two? I mean, if you're spending that kind of money, make the memories last. Crossing the Atlantic on the most luxurious cruise ship in the world --- Cunard's Queen Mary 2 --- would cost only about $1,300 per person, plus return airfare. That would beat the hell out of spending the same money for two hours in a banquet hall on the Parkway, wouldn't it? Or, on a practical level, wouldn't that money make one heckuva down payment on a dream house? (This all, probably, explains why I'm not married.) Anyway: I'm looking forward to my friend's wedding. I'm also looking forward to them having a long, happy marriage, because I think they're both swell people. But the morning after the reception, before I take back this tux, I am going to be very, very busy. I intend to paint my living room, change the oil in my car, and cut the grass, all before 12 noon. Because if I have to pay $92, I am going to beat the living crap out of this tuxedo. Posted by jt3y at May 1, 2006 07:21 AMComments
You should have done like me, and bought a tux. My wife insisted I buy one for our wedding, because she said I'd have occassion to wear it. And I have worn it--once! Posted by: Jonathan Barnes at May 1, 2006 11:14 AMAh, still another reason for me to remain unattached. (As if I didn't have enough reasons already.) TWENTY-THREE THOUSAND DOLLARS? Are they nucking futs? I didn't spend THAT much on my car, and it's been much more reliable than any of the women I've been involved with. Posted by: El "Done Me Wrong" Kabong at May 1, 2006 11:53 AMOverpriced weddings are nothing new. The daughter of a good friend got married almost 20 years ago and they laid out $15K. That's probably about $30K in today's bucks. I resisted the temptation to buy a tux when my best friend got married. I was head usher. We did the white tux coat thing. First,last, and only time I've ever worn a tux or needed to. And that was in 1972. Posted by: ebtnut at May 1, 2006 01:57 PMI dj'd weddings for about 8 years, and now that I read how much people are shelling out for their weddings, I have only one question -- why did I charge so damn little for my services? Seriously. Flowers go for, what a few thousand? Ice sculptures, cake, tuxes -- people drop far more on that stuff, which will be forgotten by the end of the reception, than they do on the entertainment which in my opinion has a lot more to do with whether it's a memorable event or not. And to think that I used to do that (for some folks) for less than $400. Ridiculous. I should've been charging $800+. I've eaten more riggy chiggy piggy at Mon Valley firehalls than should be allowed by law. Posted by: Bob at May 1, 2006 02:25 PMOK, this is making me veeery nervous...I'm about 18 months out from my alleged wedding. If you're interested, JCPenney sells the whole tuxedo for $99.00. That's what I'd get if I had to be in a wedding nowadays. I was almost in a wedding once (my friend was left at the altar by his fiance) and I had problems finding shoes as well. I take a B width, and nobody makes one in a patent leather model unless you pay an arm and a leg for it. which I wasn't. So had it happened, I would have been the floppy groomsman. Luckily, you don't walk fast in a wedding. Posted by: Steven Swain at May 2, 2006 12:15 AMAll the magazines devoted entirely to nuptuals aren't helping. most people walk out of college with so much debt, and then they strap on more when they wed in this manner. why? fashion? do something tasteful, eccentric, significant: have elvis marry you at the beach, whatever. then go spend the money on a house. yer going to need a place to put all those gifts......... Posted by: heather at May 3, 2006 05:49 PMBeing the newly engaged man that I am, I'm still having a hard time realizing how much the whole wedding is going to cost. Funny thing of all this is I had my fiance read your blog and she said "I can't wait to read his blog when he's planning his wedding". That should be interesting. Posted by: Derrick at May 4, 2006 04:38 PMMy sister is getting hitched this summer to some dude who lives in another country. They are actually coming back this way to have their wedding. My daughters both get to be bridesmaids. The chosen dresses are going to cost me a cool $800. Yay. $800 bucks for dresses that my 7 and 8 yeard olds will wear exactly once. Posted by: samk at May 5, 2006 11:05 AMPost a comment
IMPORTANT: Comments posted at the Tube City Almanac become property of the Almanac, and may be edited for content or deleted if found to be libelous. The Almanac conforms to the standards for accuracy and fairness proscribed in the Associated Press Stylebook and Briefing on Media Law.
Opinions expressed by commenters are not necessarily those of Jason Togyer, and do not necessarily represent those of the University of Pittsburgh, Dementia Unlimited, or any other organization.
Except where noted, all contents are Copyright © 2004-2007 Jason Togyer, all rights reserved, and may not be reproduced in whole or part without express permission. Further information available at our disclaimers page.
|