Tube City Online

May 05, 2006

Blue & White and Red All Over

A tipster has whispered a disquieting rumor to the Almanac: Penn State McKeesport Campus might not be for very much longer. That is to say, "McKeesport Campus."

Rumor has it, according to this source, that the university's board of trustees is mulling a decision to rename the campus "Penn State Allegheny."

The idea? Why, to distance the campus from Our Fair City!

(Gee, thanks. With friends like these ...)

I've been trying to tell the Tube City Tiger that this might just be a trial balloon that someone is floating, but he still spent most of the night growling at his poster of Joe Paterno.

...

As it turns out, PSM's student newspaper, The McKeesport Collegian, had a front page story about this very topic.

Students in a public relations class were asked to analyze the last six months of media coverage "trying to determine whether or not the name McKeesport has given the campus 'a bad rep.'" The coverage is being categorized as "positive" or "negative," though the Collegian story doesn't indicate what the tally was.

(Given that the period would include both the Tanya Kach case and the now notorious Whizzinator microwave incident, I have a feeling the tally would go against Our Fair City.)

The Collegian reports that the information is being sent to Penn State President Graham Spanier, who will determine "whether or not Penn State McKeesport should become Penn State Allegheny" or some other name.

(This is an ideal place for the Almanac to remind you, our Alert Reader, that opinions expressed in the Almanac are not those of the editor's employers or of any group for which the editor does work. In fact, sometimes, the editor is not sure they're his opinions, either.)


...

Now, the argument for renaming the campus goes like this: If the name "McKeesport" is associated with decline and crime, then prospective students will be less likely to consider PSM. (About 800 students are currently enrolled there.)

A PSM professor, Dr. Delia Conti, voiced a slightly different concern at Penn State's faculty senate meeting back in December.

"I have a houseful of seniors, and they talk about Penn State (University Park) or Penn State Erie," Professor Conti told Spanier. "They never talk about Penn State McKeesport, Penn State New Kensington, Penn State Beaver, Penn State Fayette. They go to Erie, not because of the beautiful city or the weather, but because there are four thousand students.

"Why not make the bold move and have a Penn State Pittsburgh? I know it would take a lot but it is not hard to figure out why students are picking (State College) and Erie, and not McKeesport."

Spanier said that the university is "looking very broadly" at the question, and some sort of change in how Penn State markets its southwestern Pennsylvania campuses "is conceptually consistent with the kinds of issues that are on the table."

Penn State is "not really thinking about changing anybody's name right now," Spanier said. "I do not want to get people nervous about that."

...

Well, too late, at least for the Almanac's hyper-sensitive McKeesport Anti-Defamation Detector. With our tipster's report, and the Collegian story, the alarm went straight to Code Orange.

Sure, I'm more than a decade removed from choosing my own college experience, but I understand that teen-agers are apt to chose a school for any number of superficial factors:

  • Does the college have a neat website?


  • Does it have good sports teams?


  • Are the students of the opposite sex "cute" or "cool"?


If Penn State McKeesport, or New Ken or Beaver, are at disadvantages, it's because they're suburban campuses.

Unlike Oakland or State College, you can't walk off campus and find a coffee house or a wild party. There are no bars nearby (moms and dads probably appreciate that more than the students) or fraternity and sorority houses. And of course, there are no major conference sports on campus.

...

Any student who wants the "rah-rah" big school experience is going to be disappointed at McKeesport Campus, and desperate to transfer to University Park. They're going to be dragged kicking and screaming to any suburban campus --- no matter what you call it.

Conti's comments back in December make that clear --- students go to Erie not because it's called "Penn State Erie," but because there are 4,000 students on campus.

You can call "Penn State McKeesport" anything you like, including a "meatball hoagie," but when prospective students make their first campus visit, they're going to realize that Eden Park Boulevard is not exactly Beaver Avenue in State College in terms of student life.

On the other hand, a lot of students specifically want to attend a small, suburban college because they're afraid of being lost on a big, urban campus, and because they want personal attention from the faculty and staff.

...

If the marketing value of a name change is dubious, the disadvantages are clear --- at least for the Mon-Yough area.

Taking the name "McKeesport" off of our regional campus would send a terrible message to the outside world about the city's future just as Mayor Brewster is trying to get his "McKeesport Renaissance" into high gear.

And Penn State McKeesport's 10,000 alumni might take it as a signal that they aren't important, or that their heritage has somehow been marginalized.

It also would be deeply unfair to all of the McKeesporters --- the Shaws, the Bucks, and hundreds of less prominent, but no less important families --- who donated money and time to bring Penn State to our area in the 1940s and '50s, and to keep it here since then.

Take, for example, the Crawford Trust, named for the founder of McKeesport Tin Plate Company. Since 1971, it's donated nearly a half-million dollars to Penn State McKeesport.

People in "Pittsburgh" or "Allegheny" didn't raise the money to bring the campus here --- McKeesporters and residents of the surrounding communities did.

(I also wonder how many Mon-Yough residents are Penn State sports fans specifically because they view the university as "their" school, even if they didn't attend it.)

...

Anyone who knows Penn State's reputation --- and who has seen the generous investments in recent years, both in money and in "brain power" at the McKeesport Campus --- should have no question that the campus provides excellent educational value.

The university is already marketing its Western Pennsylvania campuses under the banner "Penn State Pittsburgh." In this writer's opinion, that's a smart move. It enables students from Philadelphia or Scranton, who don't know where New Kensington and McKeesport are, to place the campuses geographically.

For that matter, since Penn State McKeesport now has students from more than 20 states and several foreign countries, grouping the five Western Pennsylvania "commonwealth campuses" under the "Penn State Pittsburgh" banner helps students in Zanesville and Zaire find them as well.

But marketing the campuses as "Penn State Pittsburgh" is one thing.

Dumping the name "McKeesport" from our local campus would be quite another.

McKeesport has always been proud of Penn State.

Please, Penn State: Be proud of McKeesport, too.

...

To Do This Weekend: Kennywood's open! If you feel like riding, just jump in your car! The roller-coaster capital is right where you are! And so forth. Call (412) 461-0500 or visit Kennywood's website. ... Port Vue Pub, 305 Laredo St., presents Matt Tichon on Saturday. Call (412) 664-0399 ... Charleroi Art & History Center hosts its second-annual regional art contest. The opening reception is tonight. Call (724) 483-4060. ... The Harold Betters Quintet plays the Boston Waterfront, 2422 Saint David Drive, Elizabeth Township, tomorrow night. Call (412) 751-8112.

Posted at 08:32 am by jt3y
Filed Under: default | four comments | Link To This Entry

May 04, 2006

Kennywood’s Open




Kennywood opens for the season on Saturday. The big new ride this summer is called the "Vomitron" ... er, I mean, the "Swingshot."

A teen-ager who tried the ride told the Daily News on Wednesday that "you feel like you're going to fall, but you don't."

In fact, sources tell the Almanac that as originally delivered to Kennywood, the ride did drop people five stories onto the pavement, but the test riders interviewed afterward all said they would "definitely not" recommend it to their friends.

Posted at 10:23 pm by jt3y
Filed Under: default | two comments | Link To This Entry

May 03, 2006

I'm Clueless --- Fly Me to McKeesport

On a regular basis, people find this little backwater on the Internet via a Google search and email me asking for advice about the Mon-Yough area. Those people are taking their lives into their hands; I wouldn't even take my own advice.

Anyway, sometimes I feel like the Greater McKeesport Convention and Visitors Bureau, a job for which I am not qualified, and I worry that I give out a lot of terrible information.

"You want to stay in a spooky old house overnight? Sure, we've got lots of spooky old houses. Will you be requiring an axe-wielding maniac, or will you be turning on one another in a murder-suicide pact?"

I received an email earlier this week from someone in Washington, D.C., who asked:

I am (last minute) planning on getting up from D.C. to McKeesport on Thursday first thing to ride back to DC. The closest interstate one-way car rental I could get was to Hertz's Pleasant Hills location (47 Clairton Blvd.) I'm thinking of dumping the bikes in McKeesport, dropping the truck off at Clairton Blvd., and then getting a cab back to McKeesport ... to save riding through rush hour traffic from the Hertz location. Total is $100-plus.


Does this sound moderately sensible? Should I be riding the 5 miles from Pleasant Hills to McKeesport?


Thanks so much if you have any info that might help. We are looking forward to breakfast in your home town.


Here's my response. Hopefully, I haven't sent this guy to his doom. I'm posting it here for anyone else using the Youghiogheny River Trail:

There is nothing inherently unsafe about riding from Pleasant Hills to McKeesport on a bike --- however, "Clairton Boulevard" is actually a busy four-lane divided highway. There are also several large shopping malls nearby. And, there are some pretty substantial "hills" (outsiders call them "mountains") to traverse.


So, a bike ride would be a bad idea, and you are probably smart to dump the bikes in the city and then return the truck.


Just make sure you put 'em someplace safe. Check down at the marina office on the riverfront --- I think there's a bike rack nearby.


Also, make sure to call for a cab reservation well in advance --- Pittsburgh cabs are notoriously hard to get, unlike other cities (like DC or Boston) where you can get 'em anywhere. Yellow Cab is your best bet in Pleasant Hills. Checker also serves that area, I think.


As for breakfast, Eat 'n Park on Route 148 downtown would be your most reliable bet (think Friendly's or Perkins). I believe Woody's Little Italy in Versailles, Pa. (just across the Route 48 bridge from the bike trail) also serves breakfast, and it's probably good. There's also a place in Boston, Pa. (adjacent to the bike trail) called Boston Diner --- I haven't been there in some time, but last time I was, they had a good, and cheap, breakfast menu.


I've asked the guy for a trip report when he gets home, so if he writes back, I'll post his comments in the Almanac.

Otherwise, I expect to hear from the executors of his estate any day now.

Posted at 08:01 am by jt3y
Filed Under: default | No comments | Link To This Entry

May 01, 2006

The Wedding Bill Blues

As I may have mentioned before, I am dangerously close to becoming an old coot, if in fact, that particular white-belt-and-shoes-to-match bridge hasn't been crossed already.

The latest sign that I am utterly and inexorably out of touch with modern American culture came last week at a large chain of tuxedo rental places.

A good friend is getting married (well, he may not be a "good friend" if he and his bride see this), and I've been asked to be part of the wedding party, which requires me to rent a monkey suit.

(Actually, it would be quite a different --- and in my opinion, better --- wedding if the bridal party wore genuine monkey suits. But no one asked me.)

...

Time was when you could rent a tux at Kadar's or David Israel's or Hi-Way Tux Shop ("VAlley 3-8042"), and be fitted by someone who actually looked like they had worn formal clothes at some point in their life.

Alas, the staff at this place (chosen by my friend and the bride because the groom's tux is free) was barely old enough to shave, let alone tie a necktie without mom's help. "Customer service" were vague words they had heard only once, briefly, in between personal cell phone calls.

And, it's prom time, which means that the rest of the customers in the joint were (like the staff) also 17-something. Everyone in the place was staring at me as if I was their dad, or possibly a narc. (I had just come from work and was wearing a suit and tie.)

...

Finally, someone who looked like she remembered the first George Bush took pity and took my measurements. The bride and groom wanted everyone to rent shoes as well, she said. Fine. They turned out to be plain black loafers of that really phony-looking shiny leatherette favored by high-school marching bands. And naturally, they didn't have them in my size.

(I take a triple-E shoe, and you know what they say about a guy with big feet. That's right: He pays more for shoes.)

Then she showed me the tux. "Is this OK?"

"Well, since it's what everyone else is wearing, I don't think I have much choice." She laughed.

...

The tux jacket was a plain single-breasted business suit cut --- no tails, and not a cutaway. The men in the wedding party won't be wearing bowties, just plain silk neckties. The shirts don't even have French cuffs. Total damage, $92.

So, I'm paying almost $100 to rent a plain black suit for one night (for less than $200, I could buy the same damned suit off the rack at Berks), plus I have to take a pair of uncomfortable shoes that aren't as nice looking as the black leather Florsheims I wore into the store. And they've got to be back before 12 noon the day after the wedding, or they'll ding me for another day's rental.

At least I don't have to worry that I'll look like a goober (any more than usual). But if I'm out 92 clams for a tuxedo, I think I should at least be getting the whole shebang --- ruffled shirt, cummerbund, maybe a powder-blue jacket with shiny black lapels or a red crushed-velvet job. Maybe I'll rent one of those for the reception.

...

Don't get me wrong --- my friend's a great guy, his bride is wonderful, too, and I'm honored as all get out to stand around and try not to make an idiot of myself at their wedding. But if you're a grumpy grouse (and I'm single, or does that go without saying?) like me, some of the preparations start to seem a bit silly, or at least way overpriced.

Take the food at the wedding reception. Back in my kidhood, Mon Valley wedding receptions were held at the fire hall, and featured the classic menu of "riggy, piggy, chicky" with a cookie table. My friend's wedding --- like all of the ones I've been to recently --- is being held at a banquet facility that specializes in weddings, and it's going to cost the bride and groom a couple of double sawbucks for each person who attends.

And frankly, my friend and his bride are doing things sensibly and conservatively, compared to some other recent weddings I've seen.

...

In a stunning coincidence, I arrived home from the tuxedo shop to read in the Christian Science Monitor that weddings are now a $120 billion per year industry in this country:

Nuptial sticker shock has become a sobering fact of life for many brides and grooms as wedding bells produce ever-larger wedding bills. More than a quarter of engaged couples now pay for everything themselves. With weddings averaging $23,000, some newlyweds remain indebted for years. Some must even seek credit counseling.


And just who do you think is pushing these spiraling costs? Why, florists, caterers and tuxedo rental shops, writer Kamy Wicoff tells the Monitor. "They imply that if you're looking at cutting costs or not doing things 'right' --- which is code for 'expensively' --- your priorities aren't straight," she says.

Increasingly elaborate weddings are self-perpetuating: If you see your friends spending five grand on flowers, well, you don't want to look like some cheap yobbo when you get married, so you spend six grand. Your friends see this, and when they get married, they spend seven grand to outdo your wedding. And so on.

...

I mean, seriously: Twenty-three grand? I know I'm an old poop, but the wedding and the reception take a total of what, four hours? Maybe five?

The couple is going to spend (Lord willing) the rest of their lives together. So wouldn't that $23,000 be better spent on a smaller, less ostentatious reception ... and a kick-ass honeymoon that lasts a week or two? I mean, if you're spending that kind of money, make the memories last. Crossing the Atlantic on the most luxurious cruise ship in the world --- Cunard's Queen Mary 2 --- would cost only about $1,300 per person, plus return airfare.

That would beat the hell out of spending the same money for two hours in a banquet hall on the Parkway, wouldn't it? Or, on a practical level, wouldn't that money make one heckuva down payment on a dream house?

(This all, probably, explains why I'm not married.)

Anyway: I'm looking forward to my friend's wedding. I'm also looking forward to them having a long, happy marriage, because I think they're both swell people.

But the morning after the reception, before I take back this tux, I am going to be very, very busy. I intend to paint my living room, change the oil in my car, and cut the grass, all before 12 noon.

Because if I have to pay $92, I am going to beat the living crap out of this tuxedo.

Posted at 07:21 am by jt3y
Filed Under: default | nine comments | Link To This Entry

Archives

Next Archive

Previous Archive