April 14, 2007
Don't Make The News a Scaife-Goat
OK, who here didn't think that the Tribune-Review was eventually going to end up owning the Daily News? Show of hands? Anyone? Bueller?
(First things first: Those of you who know me know that I'm about as welcome around the Trib as a terminal case of toe fungus, or Hillary Clinton, or maybe Hillary Clinton with toe fungus. So you can judge my credibility accordingly, and according to some people at the Trib, I have none.)
Now, before you go into apoplexy over the idea of Dick Scaife owning the great, gray lady of Lysle Boulevard, my strong suspicion is that if you're just a reader, very little is going to change about the
Daily News.
They are not going to suddenly begin investigating rumors that Vince Foster is buried in Renzie Park, or that Teresa Kerry is running for White Oak Borough Council. As best as I can tell, Mr. Scaife does not care about the slant on community journalism.
Frankly, the
Trib's suburban papers seem to exist mainly to carry the
Trib's classified ads and to boost circulation of the Sunday
Tribune-Review. (If you've been buying the
News in conjunction with the Sunday
Post-Gazette, well, forget it --- if you're a
News subscriber, you're going to get the Sunday
Trib whether you want it or not.)
. . .
If the same thing happens at the
Daily News that has happened at the other papers that the Death Star ... er, I mean the
Tribune-Review has taken over, yes, you will start seeing some editorials from the
Trib as well as sports and news stories.
Unfortunately, I suspect there will be some job losses --- mainly on the printing and distribution side --- because I assume the
Trib will move printing either to its plant in Warrendale or Greensburg. Maybe not. I hope no one loses a job --- too many people have lost jobs at the
Daily News lately. But I'm afraid it's likely.
Also, the look of the
Daily News will change drastically, because it will be designed in Pittsburgh on the
Tribune-Review's giant centralized copy desk. (I hear it looks like the galley of a slave ship, with a guy beating on a kettle drum as the overseer yells, "Faster! Faster! More headlines!")
In other words, it's going to look a lot like the
Tribune-Review. With all due respect to my friends at 409 Walnut St., that may be an improvement, because the typography of the
News over the last decade has been ... erm ... interesting. And the website will be pulled into the
Trib's system.
Otherwise, the content is unlikely to change much.
. . .
A lot of McKeesporters are going to jump up and down and stomp their feet and cancel their
Daily News subscriptions.
But if you've been reading the
Daily News faithfully, you can't help but notice the lack of advertising. Newspapers don't even cover their printing costs through subscriptions and street sales. They need about 50 percent of their content to be advertising to stay profitable.
I'd guess that many days the
News is running about 15 to 20 percent advertising. That's not sustainable. Any newspaper with that kind of ad lineage is going to eventually go out of business.
Being owned by the
Tribune-Review will make the
News more attractive to advertisers --- they can deal with one salesman and get their ad carried in Connellsville, Monessen, Kittanning, McKeesport, Greensburg and Pittsburgh.
Also, Scaife has much deeper pockets to sustain losses --- if necessary --- than either Latrobe Printing and Publishing Company or the
Mansfield family ever did.
So, if you're asking me if I'm happy that Richard Scaife will now own the
Daily News, no. But I'd only be happy if the paper was locally owned again, and that's not going to happen. And if the alternative is no
Daily News at all, then I will grudgingly accept that. No
News is not good news, in other words.
. . .
Let me say something else --- something I have told several
Daily News employees recently, and they probably think I was blowing smoke at them. The
Daily News is not the
Washington Post, but a lot of days, it's pretty damned good.
I hear a lot of McKeesporters criticizing the
Daily News. The paper stinks, there's no news in it, it's full of mistakes, blah, blah, blah, bitch, whine, complain.
- Fact: There's been more news in the News over the past 10 years than at any time since the 1960s.
- Fact: There's less bias in the News in the last 10 years than ... well, since ever. Go read some Daily News coverage from the 1920s through the 1960s. You'll learn more by seeing what the News didn't report on --- rackets, racism, pollution, corruption --- than what it did.
- Fact: The News has news from practically every community in the Mon-Yough area every week, if not every day. If you're not reading it, shame on you.
. . .
If you have a bug up your butt about Dick Scaife for whatever reason, then spite yourself. Don't buy the paper.
But when your taxes go up, or there's a string of burglaries in your neighborhood, or a school closes, don't complain because you didn't know about it. Chances are that the
Daily News had a story. Maybe it wasn't a perfectly written story, but what do you or I do that's perfect every single day?
Don't take your dislike of Dick Scaife out on the people at 409 Walnut St. (By the way, Scaife's foundations have donated
thousands of dollars to Mon Valley groups, including the Greater Pittsburgh Community Food Bank and the Garden Club of McKeesport, which maintains the arboretum at Renzie Park. Put that in your National Tube and smoke it.)
And remember that if you don't support that newspaper, well, Scaife's not going to throw money down a hole forever.
Whatever Scaife's political activities may be, no one at the
Daily News (and hardly anyone at the
Trib) is involved. The people at the
News are trying to make a living and maybe do some journalism, and no matter who owns them, they're going to be out there picking up police blotters and covering school board meetings and high school sports the way they have for 123 years.
And if we should be so lucky, for another 123 years to come.
April 13, 2007
Random Thoughts From a Specific Mind
(Guest Commentary: Officer Jim)
I’m starting to get the feeling that I need to rectify the previously mentioned lack of Internet service at home, if only so that I can begin paying my bills online. Heretofore, I’ve been quite content with writing out a check and affixing a stamp to an envelope.
But in the month of February, I apparently somehow never received a billing statement from the holder of my student loans and now, as I found out Thursday, from my cell phone provider.
As a result, in March I had to make a double payment on my loan which was quite a hit all at once. It’s also resulted in repeated phone calls from my “loan counselor.” Not that I know exactly what he wants, because every time he calls I don’t recognize the number so I don’t answer it.
But I can only assume it has something to do with the missed payment (the one missed payment, in the last five years, by the way) and they’re trying to cover their arses if I should default on the loan.
'Cause, ya know, missing one payment in five years is certainly an indicator that I’m a deadbeat.
Not that I’m not a deadbeat, mind you. (I swear, I’ll pay my brother the $230 bucks I owe him from the trip to North Carolina. Eventually.) But surely my track record isn’t that bad. (No it’s not, and don’t call me Shirley.)
Granted, it’s not the fault of the United States Postal Service, the loan holder, or the phone company to keep track of what statements I’ve received or what bills I’ve paid.
But I have several bills that come in each month, not counting my rent payments. And while I’m usually pretty good at keeping my unpaid bills organized, and paying them on time, I can’t remember everything. So there are only two conclusions I can make:
- I received the statements in the mail, but simply ignored them or threw them out, then used a mind-altering device or substance to totally wipe out any memory of them, or;
- They were never delivered to me in the first place.
Now, I hate to cast dispersions on the good men and women of the Postal Service. They do a fine job of delivering a fistful of junk mail to my doorstep six days a week.
But I suspect they dropped the ball on this one. Or, more accurately, they dropped my mail down a sewer grate or something. And seeing as how I can’t afford to have my credit screwed up with missed bill payments (okay, okay, screwed up any more), I guess I’ll have to stumble just a little more into the late 20th Century and start exploring Internet Service Providers.
I’m sure that the USPS is quivering in fear right now. I just hope
Wilfred Brimley doesn’t show up on my doorstep.
. . .
I followed a car yesterday with a
NASCAR license plate, duly issued by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. I don’t know why this bothers me, but it does.
A plate for
wildlife conservation? Sure, I can support that.
Something showing support for the Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission? Yeah, okay.
A plate for our
nation’s veterans? Absolutely!
But really, NASCAR? I know that it’s one of the fastest growing spectator sports in the country. But what on God’s green earth made PennDOT decide that we needed to approve a NASCAR license plate?
Maybe I’m just a grump on this (
maybe?), but the proliferation of license plates is really getting on my nerves. You can’t tell where the heck a plate is from anymore until you’re right on top of it. Can we just get back to simple two-color plates with bold, clearly legible letter and numbers? Is it too much to ask to be able to distinguish a Pennsylvania plate from an Ohio or Kentucky plate without resorting to a guide book?
. . .
And from the
Department of Pointing Out the Obvious, the
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette ran a
story in yesterday’s paper detailing several lawsuits filed by candidates for positions on the McKeesport school board.
I’m not going to go into details of the maneuverings being performed and challenged by various sitting board members who are candidates but not for their current seats but for another seat but who want to hold their current seat but want to run for a different seat, blah blah blah ...
It's an interesting, creative, and in my opinion dubious attempt being made to circumvent the electoral process in my opinion, but I don't want to get into that just now.
Instead, I’d just like to point out the headline that One of America’s Great Newspapers used for the story:
“McKeesport school board candidates playing politics”
No! Really? I don’t believe that! I am shocked, shocked I tells ya!
No offense to the editorial staff of the
P-G, but couldn’t you have come up with a better headline? After all, they’re candidates for political office in the Mon Valley: What the heck would they be playing, backgammon?
The
headline in
The Daily News at least didn’t point out the bloody obvious.
Posted at 01:54 am by officerjim
Filed Under: default | one comment | Link To This Entry
April 11, 2007
The Stingy Man Pays the Most
(Guest Commentary: Officer Jim)
Uh oh! I'm gonna be in trouble here, leaving The Almanac without an update for so long. Sorry about the delay folks, but unfortunately I happen to be a very cheap guy. You see, I'm one of the few people left who doesn't have a connection to the internet tubes in my humble domicile.
It's not that I have anything against the internet. Far from it. I use it every day, in fact. I'm just too darn Scrooge-like for my own good. Heck, I'm still holding out against getting cable. And I don't think that Guglielmo's invention is anything more than a trend. And that Ford fella's too clever for his own good! Harumph!
Okay, okay, so I'm not that behind the times. It's really for the best that I keep from having internet access. As it stands now, I get home from work about 11:30 in the evening and usually don't go to bed until 2 or 3 in the morning. If I had internet access, I'd probably be up all night drooling over images on some bizarre website.
So you see, it can be somewhat difficult to post to a blog without the requisite access to an internet connection. Normally this isn't much of a problem, as my employer is somewhat generous in the amount of down time that I'm able to take advantage of; or, at the very least, "what chief don't know don't hurt me!"
These last few days, for whatever reason, have kept me a little too busy. I mean, I hardly had time to finish the second doughnut let alone sit down and write something witty and clever (and then erase that and type the dreck you've been reading).
So, mea culpa on my part for not fulfilling the obligations that I made to your humble (!) webmaster and you, the dear reader(s?). I swear on my sainted Aunt Eunice's grave that I will never, ever slack in my duties, or may I be run over by a streetcar.
Of course, I never had an Aunt Eunice...
And the closest thing to a streetcar line is the "T", and I live in the Mon Valley...
But you get the picture.
. . .
Speaking of pictures, the Garden Theatre (spelled "re" 'cause it's classy that way) has shown its last adult film. Pittsburgh's Urban Redevelopment Authority finally won its six-year battle to claim the theater under "eminent domain" in an effort to spur further revitalization of the North Side.
According to the article in today's paper, the URA bought the theater for $1.1 million back in February. They have no new buyer yet for the property, but URA project manager Angelo Taranto "said interested developers will be shown through the building as soon as consultants can assess the building's soundness, the content and value of its interior assets and clear debris."
In the meantime, $1.1 million of public money was spent for yet another building in the county to be owned by a public entity and off the tax rolls. That's just the purchase price, of course. That doesn't take into account the no doubt millions in legal fees that have piled up over the last 6 years, all at taxpayer expense.
I'm no smut peddler, nor have I ever set foot in the Garden Theatre (or other like establishments). And while I'm not a prude, I can acknowledge that an adult establishment isn't exactly the type of joint you'd want next door to your home, or on the block that your children walked to get to school, or across the street from the grocery store you shop at. On the list of desirable businesses, I imagine it ranks far down on the list next to "rendering plant" and "medical waste incinerator."
But it is a tax-paying entity, is it not? Property taxes were being paid, right? Income taxes and the $52 Emergency and Municipal Services tax were being paid, right? Sales taxes were being paid, right? There was a tax-paying business on that property, albeit a non-desirable one, right?
And now there's another empty, government-owned building on the North Side. Somehow, another empty building in Pittsburgh seems slightly more obscene than the movies that were once shown there.
. . .
Locally, the Borough of Homestead is looking at a lawsuit from another entity that wished to purchase the empty former bank building at Eighth Avenue and Amity Street for use as a "gentleman's club."
According to a March article in the Post-Gazette, two national operators of strip clubs signed a sales agreement for the $660,000 lease-purchase of the property in June 2006. Allegedly, after representatives met with borough officials, council passed an ordinance that effectively would prevent the firm from doing business in that building.
Again, do we necessarily need a strip club at the entrance to the Waterfront development? And seeing that Eighth Avenue already possesses two adult businesses, as well as open prostitution on the same street, does Homestead really need that type of business? Maybe not.
But one thing Homestead definitely does not need is another building sitting empty. (Or near-empty, as the basement houses a day care center. Presumably that present tenant wouldn't co-exist with the potential new one.)
I dunno. In an area that is starved for business and tax dollars, can beggars be choosers? These types of businesses are going to exist somewhere. They're going to be giving those tax dollars to some municipality, who will gladly take their money even if they (understandably) accept the cash with an up-turned nose.
So why shouldn't one city that's still in the throes of Act 47 bankruptcy, and another borough that's just barely clawed its way out of bankruptcy, take advantage of those tax dollars (and maybe reduce the burden on the tax-paying residents a little)?
I could be wrong about it, but isn't a bird in the hand worth two in the ... er, um, you know what I mean.
Posted at 05:00 am by officerjim
Filed Under: default | one comment | Link To This Entry