Tube City Almanac

June 18, 2008

Coke Works Hearing Set Thursday

Category: Local Businesses, News || By

ThyssenKrupp AG photo


A hearing on U.S. Steel's plans to upgrade the Clairton Works is slated for 6:30 p.m. tomorrow at the Clairton Municipal Building on Ravensburg Boulevard.

The Allegheny County Health Department's Air Quality Division must give its consent to the $1 billion project to replace three old coke batteries with one newer facility.

Neil Bhaerman, a program organizer for Clean Water Action, says the environmental advocacy group is pushing the Health Department to do a more thorough examination of the work that U.S. Steel is planning.

In addition, the group wants the county to get more data on the coke works in Germany that the Clairton plant's new equipment will be modeled after.

"I'm glad they're putting the investment into the coke works in Clairton, and I'm glad they're making coke, but they need to be doing it as cleanly as possible," Bhaerman says.

"That's why it's going to be really important what the Health Department puts into the permit," he says. "We're not opposing the new batteries. We just want to make sure that they use the best technology."

. . .

U.S. Steel and its predecessors have been making coke in Clairton for more than a century.

Used to fuel furnaces and boilers, coke is created when coal is heated to burn off impurities. Cooking the coal releases gases and soot; some of the gases are captured to create chemicals used in paints, glues, plastics and solvents, but others escape into the air.

The Clairton Works is the largest coke-making plant in the United States and one of the largest in the world. Despite modernization projects throughout the 1980s and '90s, the plant has also been blamed by the American Lung Association and other groups with causing abnormally high levels of air pollution in the Mon Valley.

The Lung Association in April called the Pittsburgh region the "sootiest" metropolitan area in the nation based on air pollution readings taken in Liberty Borough, directly opposite Clairton.

U.S. Steel argues that the new batteries being installed at Clairton will be more efficient and emit radically lower levels of soot and gases.

. . .

The technology was pioneered by the German steelmaking giant ThyssenKrupp AG at a new coke plant built in Duisburg, Germany, in 2002.

The plant replaced a 100-year-old facility that ThyssenKrupp says had generated complaints from residents about pollution.

"Demands for the coke-oven plant's closure became more and more insistent," the company reports in a book about the works.

Duisburg is located in Germany's Essen region, which remains a steel center comparable to the Mon Valley during the 20th century.

. . .

Click to visit Google MapsEngineers for ThyssenKrupp, which needed to continue making coke to fuel its nearby mills, designed a plant with fewer but larger ovens, which theoretically should provide fewer places for gases and soot to escape.

According to the company, environmental controls at the Schwelgern plant allow air pressure inside each coke oven to be individually adjusted. Each oven remains under negative pressure --- suction --- to prevent coke gas from leaking out.

Pressure is automatically lowered before the oven doors are open, which ThyssenKrupp claims "almost entirely" prevents emissions from the doors.

In addition, the hot coke is cooled with water, rather than by exposure to air, to meet strict German air quality standards.

. . .

Although U.S. Steel and county Health Department
officials both contend that the upgrades will dramatically reduce pollution from the Clairton Works, Bhaerman claims that pictures of the Schwelgern plant provided by German activists show "incredibly dirty emissions."

The county Health Department in March sent its own representatives to Duisburg to examine the coke plant, but Bhaerman argues their inspection was not extensive enough to spot any pattern of environmental problems.

"The Health Department really should have examined the application from that plant and their inspection records," he says. "It might be the best (technology) but there might also be problems they haven't examined without really going through all of the records of that plant."

. . .

The Allegheny County Health Department is still accepting comments via email at aqpermits@achd.net. Details of the proposed upgrades can also be downloaded from the department's website. Click the links in the upper right-hand column under the headline, "Air Quality Permits in Public Comment."






Your Comments are Welcome!

I’m not an engineering expert, but I would think ANY new coke equipment would be better than the old ones that have been around forever. Even if the pollution output is the same, at least more coke would be make without any ADDITIONAL pollution.
The Dude - June 19, 2008




Gee whiz, a billion dollar investment by a major Mon Valley employer that not only modernizes part of the plant but also reduces pollution, and people are saying it’s not enough? Uh, can they start the construction today?
Dan - June 19, 2008




This is dated June 2008—where are the improvements??? LOL-I haven’t SMELLED one improvement or VIEWED one improvement…I still get the NASTY smell from the plant and the BLACK SOOT all over house, KIDS TOYS, INSIDE CLOSETS, etc…DISGUSTING! I want my HOUSE SWABBED to see what we are breathing in.
HJF - May 11, 2009




To (HJF)... Then why did you move near the plant? Move somewhere else if you are sick of the soot. The plant has been there for 100 years, I’m assuming you have not lived there for over 100 years. You are like one of those people that move down the street from an airport but then complain about the noise. People love to complain about industrial plants like this but when their wishes come true and the EPA shuts them down, the same people are complaining about the jobs moving over seas and no more jobs in the area. HAHA! Whether it’s made here or in China, it’s going to be made. There’s always going to be a very high demand for Coke. You can’t have Steel without Coke and last time I checked our entire country’s infrastructure uses MASSIVE AMOUNTS of Steel. So my point is that if you are truly worried about the environment then I would rather have industry here in the States where we do stuff as clean as possible rather than have it go to China where they have almost next to none environmental restrictions. And if you are truly worried about your health, then my advice to you is don’t move near heavy industrial plants. It’s sort of common sense. I’m not trying to be rude so please don’t take my comment that way. I just simply don’t understand why people do that. I mean you obviously knew the plant was there, right? And I understand that it’s dirty but that doesn’t mean that they are just blatantly polluting the environment. People have to understand that they are doing stuff as clean as they can but it’s just the nature of the beast, it’s a dirty industry. And as long as we keep building skyscrapers, cars, trucks, trains, bridges, etc etc.. The industry will exist.

Kurtis
Kurtis - December 12, 2012




To comment on any story at Tube City Almanac, email tubecitytiger@gmail.com, send a tweet to www.twitter.com/tubecityonline, visit our Facebook page, or write to Tube City Almanac, P.O. Box 94, McKeesport, PA 15134.