Category: default || By jt3y
I had something of a perfect storm late last week --- the water heater blew up and the two-hour job of replacing it took all day, and then I came down with a bad cold --- so you were spared my bloviating on the results of the elections. Keep that in mind: There's something else to be grateful for on Thanksgiving.
I will drop a few pearls of wisdom (actually, they're more like "cubic zirconia of obviousness") on you, however.
U.S. Sen. Rick Santorum accused state Treasurer Bob Casey of “aiding and abetting terrorism and genocide,” saying Sunday that state pension funds are invested with companies linked to terrorist-sponsoring states.
Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, Monday, October 30, 2006
“I congratulate him, and I mean that wholeheartedly. He ran an excellent campaign. He is a fine man and I know that he will do a fine job for Pennsylvania. Please give him a round of applause.”
Senator Rick Santorum conceding to Bob Casey, election night, Tuesday, November 7, 2006
The gracious concession speech is a tradition in American politics. The honorable campaign is not. Which is the true measure of a person’s character? Did Senator Santorum’s concession speech show humility or was it disingenuous and self-serving? Either way, it was a sound political move.
Strisi - November 13, 2006
Sen. Torquemada has spent much of his career demonizing people he doesn’t agree with —- gays, liberals, working mothers, non-Christians, moderates, people who take more napkins at Wendy’s than they need —- so the gracious campaign speech isn’t a tradition for him. But I see your point.
Again, if he had displayed any of that grace over the previous 12 years, things might have been different last Tuesday.
I think his often intemperate words for his enemies also explain why there’s so much ill-concealed glee over his defeat.
Webmaster (URL) - November 13, 2006
If Senator Santorum had displayed any of that grace over the past 12 years, he wouldn’t be who he is — as you aptly describe him — our century’s scion of the Spanish Inquisition. My point is that neither he, nor many of the traditional conventions of politics are honorable. Lee Atwater, Karl Rove and John Brabender did not invent character assassination as a campaign tool. They simply put a new edge on an old sword. Some candidates hold that sword with a dainty grip. Rick Santorum grabbed it tight with both hands.
Was there humility in his concession speech? Were his teary- eyed children a sympathetic sight? For a moment, I thought so. Then I remembered what Rick stood for. I thought of the tears of the families of all the Iraq War casualties. That speech was sound politics. I hope that in his case it’s too little, too late.
Strisi - November 14, 2006
This was a weird election. I voted for candidates I felt were the best running for their particular posts. Three of four were losers so you can guess at least two of my choices. I also can say at least one was neutralized by a dear disabled relative’s vote (who probably has a better sense for current events that a lot of allegedly normal folk). Now that the election is over, we’re already reaping the benefits, including the prospect of higher taxes in a state where casinos were supposed to be a panacea. Meanwhile, my one winning candidate seems to have something in common with a former North Hills lawmaker. Weird.
Does it really matter? - November 14, 2006
To comment on any story at Tube City Almanac, email tubecitytiger@gmail.com, send a tweet to www.twitter.com/tubecityonline, visit our Facebook page, or write to Tube City Almanac, P.O. Box 94, McKeesport, PA 15134.