Category: Good Government On The March || By
Allegheny County Chief Executive Dan Onorato wants to block users from searching the county's real estate website by the names of property owners.
According to Justin Vellucci of the Tribune-Review, Onorato told county council the website "has been used for purposes other than those intended by council, such as locating law enforcement officials, teachers, judges and victims of violent crimes."
Interestingly enough, according to Vellucci, Onorato's spokeswoman "could not provide details on those incidents Friday."
Hmm. I don't want to say Onorato might be blowing smoke, but there's a definitely a whiff of something in the breeze.
I don't deny that some baddies have likely used to the property assessment website to look for information on people. Here's the thing: Bad guys have always been able to find out the addresses of people they wanted to harm or stalk. I'm not convinced that the real estate website is such a clear and present danger. And whenever a property is bought or sold, the listing is published in the newspaper anyway. This is a fig leaf at best.
. . .
But do you know who else people can search for on the website? Politicians. They can find out what properties that elected officials own. They can see if those properties are being maintained. And they can see if those local officials are paying their real-estate taxes on time. That includes your school board members, state legislators, borough councilors, township commissioners, etc.
I am not accusing Onorato of any wrongdoing. But I'm against almost every measure to restrict access to public records that the public pays for. We already block the public from searching too many records in this state. (Pennsylvania's open records laws are among the worst in the nation.) We don't need to add more restrictions.
And I am 100 percent against measures which make it harder to keep public officials accountable.
If you care about holding your public servants accountable, write to your county council representative and tell him or her that removing the names from the property database is a bad idea:
Trau and Loevner Inc., a supplier of imprinted sportswear, plans to relocate its distribution and warehouse facilities from Shadyside into the three former A. J. Silberman & Co. warehouses in Braddock.
The company recently completed the purchase of the 62,000-square-foot complex for $795,000. Its current site at 5000 Baum Blvd. in Shadyside was acquired by the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, said Martha Graham of Massaro Properties LLC, who represented Trau and Loevner in its purchase.
Silberman, a wholesale supplier of food, cigarettes, candy and beauty care products, is relocating to the former Mitchell Plastics Inc. building at 267 Blue Run Road in Indiana Township.
The new tenant was described to me as a "T-shirt firm," apparently someone's idea of how to slander a long-established Western Pennsylvania business.
The Silberman boys never shared their father's feelings about helping poor Braddock. No doubt also, the idiots in charge of the Borough Council and the greedy tax collection firm compounded the problem.
What is unpleasant is the role of the state and county agencies in moving a major employer out of the Mon Valley so they can claim it as a new industry for Indianola (near Fox Chapel/O'Hara Twp). There was no chance this business would have moved to Ohio or another state.
There was a book a few years back titled "A Confederacy of Dunces." This problem resulted apparently resulted from an "Aggregation of A--holes." Sad.
The large mayor was so busy attracting non-paying artrists to Braddock he was unable to be a factor in preventing the loss of a major employer.
That's the nice thing about Braddock ... just when you think things can't get much worse, they surprise you!
The large mayor was so busy attracting non-paying artrists to Braddock he was unable to be a factor in preventing the loss of a major employer.
The impression I get is Braddock’s mayor is very weak in terms of powers, nd that most rest with council.
He was going to, what, go ask nicely? “Please stay?”
If his powers permit him to be a figurehead should I be surprised if he is? Disappointed?
I don’t even remember who the last mayor of Braddock was.
Derrick - October 24, 2007
I share your position on access to information on elected officials.
Paul Shelly (URL) - October 24, 2007
After a week of thinking about that, it occurred to be that you are dead on about the Waterfront. I’ve seen what public funding has done for redevelopment on the south side of the railroad tracks in Homestead (I recently came up with an article I wrote in 1980 about it that I could rewrite with a few minor changes today and still be relevant). However, as much as I resent the developer deciding to all but appeal for annexation to Pittsburgh (except that it would have lost the TIF that helped it out from the Steel Valley communities), there is no doubt that the privately-funded Waterfront still is head and shoulders above any other redevelopment of a former millsite along the Monongahela River.
Does it matter? - October 27, 2007
To comment on any story at Tube City Almanac, email tubecitytiger@gmail.com, send a tweet to www.twitter.com/tubecityonline, visit our Facebook page, or write to Tube City Almanac, P.O. Box 94, McKeesport, PA 15134.