Category: Mon Valley Miscellany || By
An aside: I'm not sure that Heckman's "most importantly" line should be taken literally. It was probably intended to help an audience of Pitt students, faculty and staff relate to the topic.
But it sure rings cold to people whose houses or businesses stand in the highway's path. My house is one block from the projected Dravosburg section of the road.
And it also adds strength to the argument that the MFX isn't really intended to help the Mon Valley --- it's to help Pittsburgh and East Hills commuters bypass the Mon Valley.
(* -- Correction appended April 16. See comments for details.)
The MFX was conceived in a different time during a definitively different economy.
In a previous posting, Dependable and Sturdy,
http://www.tubecityonline.com/almanac/entry_942.php you referenced Hank Yarbo of the television comedy Corner Gas. http://www.cornergas.com/home/
Remember the episode when Lacey inherits the coffee shop and her small changes to the decor upset Hank and others? How about the one where she causes a kerfuffle by filling the town’s pothole? Dog River, the setting for the show, is well-kept and quaint. A town on a television program can get away with being quaint, but a regional economy can’t. Where is the comprehensive plan that shows how the MFX enables the area served to compete for jobs in a global economy?
“The apparent low bid for the second contract on the Port Authority’s light-rail extension project came in at $48.9 million yesterday, well over budget.” — Joe Grata, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, Wednesday, April 16, 2008
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/08107/873655-53.stm The bid is nearly 50% over the engineering estimate for that phase of the tunnel project.
$3.5 billion is the estimated cost to finish the MFX. Is it possible that number might be a little on the light side?
Visionary public planners know that a 21st century economy will flourish in dense metropolitan areas with low energy and infrastructure maintenance costs. We need to rewrite municipal zoning laws to foster a high quality of life without sprawl. Any new road building must compliment a new way of thinking. “Or we’ll find ourselves standing around without any underpants, waving at the cars as they drive by” ... in the Dog River Valley.
Strisi - April 16, 2008
Correction: I wrote that “$3.5 billion is the estimated cost to finish the MFX.” The most recent cost estimate for the Allegheny County leg of the MFX is $3.8 billion. http://www.paturnpike.com/news/2008/march/nr030408.htm
Add $1.4 billion for the rest of the expressway, including the Southern Beltway, $435 million (and rising) for the North Shore Connector and the $18 billion dollar infrastructure shortfall that Andrea Boykowycz cites and you have to wonder if there will be any money left in the U.S. Treasury to rebuild New Orleans or Iraq. I wonder if the $18 billion figure includes the estimated $3 billion needed to satisfy the federal mandate to upgrade Allegheny County sewer systems by 2026.
The point is that we need to spend development dollars wisely, and that means lobbying Washington for a different method of allocation.
Andrea Boykowycz and John Fetterman are not alone in fighting decisions based on a century of automobile culture. One of the visionary public planners I referred to in my previous comment is Bruce Katz of the Metropolitan Policy Program at the Brookings Institute. Last year he visited Pittsburgh to receive the Heinz Award “for his work in advocating for cities through smart growth.” http://www.popcitymedia.com/features/43katz.aspx
We don’t need county and municipal government to reinvent the wheel. There is plenty of substantive information available to plan for a more prosperous future. Ms. Boykowycz points to a failure of “political courage” and a lack of “political leadership.” I agree. Will anyone dispute that?
Strisi - April 16, 2008
Remember the episode when Lacey inherits the coffee shop and her small changes to the decor upset Hank and others? How about the one where she causes a kerfuffle by filling the town’s pothole?
Now that you mention it, building an expressway is the kind of an idea they would like in Woolerton.
(ptui!)
Webmaster - April 16, 2008
Hi Jason – thanks for the write-up! And I love the underpants gnomes metaphor, I’m going to have to use that in the future. ;)
The $18B figure is actually for the SPC region, not Allegheny County — I hope I didn’t slip up and say it was just for Allegheny County. You can see the illustrative projects list from the most recent Long Range Plan here: http://www.spcregion.org/pdf/lrp/2035_Plan_6_Transportation_Plan_June07.pdf (see p. 59). $13.25 billion in unmet maintenance and operations needs for highways and bridges; $6.5 billion in unmet maintenance and operations needs for public transit.
I guess that’s more like $19 billion. I was feeling a little flustered up there.
No, that figure doesn’t include the $10B that it’s going to take to rebuild our sewers. And nevermind the water mains that keep breaking in the lower Valley — that nightmare isn’t over, either.
Andrea Boykowycz (URL) - April 16, 2008
Also — whenever you think about the real cost of building out the MFX, you have to consider the impact that the bond costs are having to the bottom line. Oil and raw materials and labor keep getting more expensive, of course, and that’s part of the increase in price; but you can’t ignore the rising cost of money, especially not in the current credit crunch. The Turnpike has just had its bond rating lowered a notch for the folly of fulfilling its obligations under Act 44. http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/08105/873293-147.stm — that could have a pretty serious impact if they start looking to take on new debt to build the MFX.
Andrea Boykowycz (URL) - April 16, 2008
To comment on any story at Tube City Almanac, email tubecitytiger@gmail.com, send a tweet to www.twitter.com/tubecityonline, visit our Facebook page, or write to Tube City Almanac, P.O. Box 94, McKeesport, PA 15134.