Category: Commentary/Editorial || By
(Third in a series of ruminations on the Mon-Fayette Expressway.)
Editor's Note: I'm not "anti-highway." Longtime readers know that I love to drive.
I'm also not "anti-development." If Tube City Almanac has a bias, it's toward building more shiny, new things in the Mon Valley.
Finally: I'm just a simple country doctor reporter, not a moon-shuttle conductor statistician or civil engineer. My conclusions and comparisons may be completely inaccurate. Caveat emptor.
. . .
Before we get into this installment, I'd thought I'd point out a couple of comments from Monday's Almanac.
First, Andrea Boykowycz of PennFuture --- an outspoken opponent of the Mon-Fayette Expressway --- says my math is off. Based on current traffic levels along the Parkway East, I "guesstimated" that 60,000 to 70,000 vehicles might use the MFX in Allegheny County.
Andrea cites a Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission report that says it's more like 50,000 vehicles a day. Also, she says that as of last March, the cost of completing the legs of the MFX north of Route 51 had climbed to $3.8 billion.
Naturally, that all makes the math behind the MFX considerably worse than I suggested.
. . .
Second, Alert Reader R.D. points out something obvious --- that areas in the Pittsburgh metro area that have the healthiest business districts --- like Monroeville, Cranberry and Robinson --- all have direct interstate highway access:
I was already working in Cranberry just a few weeks before the Parkway North opened. In addition to cutting my commute time significantly, the effect on local business, home construction and tax revenues was unbelievably dramatic.
By the time I left in 1995, development was completely out of control ... Would that we in the Mon Valley should have such problems.
I’ve only had time to briefly scan this excellent series, so forgive me if you’ve covered this — but to my mind, the growth of Cranberry is coming at the expense of the McKnight Road corridor.
Drive up and down McKnight and count the empty storefronts. It’s a significan percentage, and growing larger by the day.
Bob (URL) - January 30, 2009
What you’re suggesting is that highways only spread development around; they don’t attract new development.
Since we’ve had no net influx of people/consumers — in fact, our population of consumers has steadily dropped — that makes perfect sense.
To cite another example, Century III Mall has been in decline for 20 years, but it took a sharp turn for the worse when the Waterfront opened. There are only so many shopping dollars to go around.
Webmaster - January 30, 2009
We here in the DC area have similar problems, though no where near as bad (or apparent) as is the case in the ‘Burg region. The old maxim, “build it and they will come” has held true here for the past 50 years. All you have to do is look at the rush hour traffic on the major highways and interstates, where the back-ups begin 40 miles from downtown DC. People have traded gas money for home prices to the extent that we have folks living around Hagerstown, Martinsburg, and even Gettysburg commuting into the metro area.
Granted that DC has been somewhat insulated from the major recession due to the presence of the Federal Government. But we just got an economic report that says, among other things, that the condo market in this area is going to be essentially dead for 10 or more years. Housing prices have dropped 15% or more in the past 18 months in what had been one of the hottest real estate markets in the nation. In addition, the number of home-buyers is going to drop. A couple of years ago there were 5 buyers for each house being sold. They predict that by 2020 there will be 2 sellers for each buyer, which means that home prices are not going to recover much.
The growing, and aging baby-boomers are a different retail cohort than the younger generations. They don’t buy as much “stuff”. They’re not buying and selling houses with resulting new furnishings and appliances, etc. They’re less apt to buy new cars as quickly.
In sum, the characteristics of the workforce and the employment base have much more to do with the state of growth and housing, not just proximity to interstates.
I’m of two minds about the Mon-Fay project. On the one hand, I think having a decent highway connection from the Parkway East down through the Mon Valley would be a good thing for just getting around. Banging down through Duquesne and Kennywood to the Rankin Bridge and Squirrel Hill is not much fun.
OTOH, as Jason has rightly pointed out, is the cost of doing a toll-way caliber project really worth the cost? How about improving Rt. 837, building a new bridge at Port Perry, and maybe going through the hill on the Wilmerding side? Better yet, let’s get some new major employment into the region so folks will have some reason to either stay or come here.
GO STEELERS!!!
ebtnut - January 30, 2009
There are many, many alternatives to building the MFX that would deliver improved access to the Mon Valley — it’s mainly a question of building support for one or more of those projects and delivering pressure to the county to get behind them.
Just for the record, I’m no longer with PennFuture (though I and PF both remain outspoken opponents of the completion of the MFX).
Andrea Boykowycz - January 31, 2009
Why couldn’t the expressway be a 2-lane road with a speed limit of 40 mph? It would still be a nicer than all the stop-n-go one has to endure getting around here. It will drop the price significantly. Once that much is paid off from the tolls collected, then two more lanes can be built and the speed increased to 65?
Thee Dude - February 02, 2009
To comment on any story at Tube City Almanac, email tubecitytiger@gmail.com, send a tweet to www.twitter.com/tubecityonline, visit our Facebook page, or write to Tube City Almanac, P.O. Box 94, McKeesport, PA 15134.